How far can aspects of identity be seen to affect the way in which audiences use online media? Discuss, with reference to Zoella and Attitude. [30]
- Hyperreality. Hyperreal representation of a middle class female woman. Hyperreal representation of a gay man- Zoella picnic (unsexualised, idealistic middle class lifestyle. cultivation theory George Gerberner)
- Attitude (gay guys are all hypersexualised)
- Zoella pyjamas (non-sexualised)
- Zoella apartment tour (comodity fetishism, aspirational job)
- End of Audience theory Clay Shirky (No comments section on Attitude)(Zoella comment section. Fuck Zoella Account)
- Theorist Identity David Gauntlett
- Stuart Hall Representation
George Gerbner Cultivation theory
To what extent do Zoella and Attitude reflect the social and historical context of the time when they were made? [30]
- Both modern (blogging, vlogging) (openly gay magazine and website) INTERNET 2.0
- Hyperlinks (encourages hypermodality)
-
- Both Attitude and Zoella manipulate their audience through reductive and simplistic representations for the sole purpose of profit.
- Both Attitude and Zoella manipulate their audience through reductive and simplistic representations for the sole purpose of profit.
Comments
Post a Comment